Bible Books Etc Nazism, Fascism Spirituality

Good Faith versus Bad Faith

Bad Monotheism – Bad Faith

I don’t think the greatest enemy of monotheism is atheism, agnosticism, polytheism, dualism, or pantheism: It is bad monotheism, monotheism carried out in bad faith.


“Bad faith” is NOT a virtue even in our very freedom-loving society. Promises are to be kept, contracts fulfilled, responsibilities exercised “in good faith.” It’s actually a legal requirement, though often unenforceable.

And it applies very much to religious faith and behavior. As Scripture says, “the name of God is blasphemed among the unbelievers because of you.” We have a huge problem with that in America today. The

  • self-worshiping,
  • self-promoting,
  • angry,
  • dishonest,
  • judgemental,
  • hypocritical,
  • power-grubbing behavior

that passes for “faith” in public life today is repulsive to true believers and unbelievers alike. Surely it is bad faith. And surely it constitutes “taking God’s name in vain.”

“Right faith that isn’t good faith isn’t really right faith.”

The first chapter in Brian McLaren’s Finding Faith: A Self-Discovery Guide for Your Spiritual Quest is devoted largely to distinguishing between “good faith” and “bad faith”. In it he tries to determine what sensible people mean when they say things like, “It doesn’t matter what you believe as long as you’re sincere,” and comes up with this:

I think these people realize something quite profound: “Right faith that isn’t good faith isn’t really right faith.” (Faith that believes true things, but does so in an ugly or inappropriate way, isn’t justified just because it is conceptually correct.) They might even be going further: “I would rather have a wrong faith that is good than a right faith that is bad.” (I would rather hold some inaccurate beliefs with a good heart, so to speak, than be accurate in all the details and yet have the wrong approach, the wrong attitude.)

He then asks a logical next question:

… wouldn’t people with good faith come, over time, to have an increasingly accurate faith? … isn’t the goal of a right faith best served by concentrating hard on a good faith?

Many people who are rejecting faith are rejecting “bad” faith.

 They have decided that the operating system they inherited or installed is “no good.”

  • It doesn’t work for them.
  • Maybe it can’t account for the data presented by real life.
  • Maybe it doesn’t make its adherents into better people.
  • Maybe it is too complicated to be useful.
  • Maybe long-term it is too boring or depressing to be livable.

For these and other reasons, people often “lose faith,” meaning they discard their version of faith.

Then McLaren lists descriptors, eight for “Bad Faith” and seven for “Good Faith”

I wonder what you think of these. (I guess if you want to read his description of each, you’ll have to find a copy of the book.)


  1. Bad faith is based solely on unquestioned authority.
  2. Bad faith is based on pressure or coercion.
  3. Bad faith is often the result of a psychological need for belonging.
  4. Bad faith appeals to self-interest and base motives.
  5. Bad faith is arrogant and unteachable.
  6. Bad faith is dishonest.
  7. Bad faith is apathetic … if my faith produces no action, it cannot be good faith… Sometimes this lack of action is covered by a surplus of talk … Sometimes people substitute the active life of faith with the fascinating lore of faith …
  8. Bad faith is a step backward….A faith that makes me less loving, mature, wise, alive, or responsible sounds to me like bad faith….Healthy people don’t step backward or down; they only step forward or up. This insight explains both why some people leave faith and others accept it; in either case, their move into or out of faith is perceived by them as a step UP.


  1. Good faith is humble, teachable, and inquisitive.
  2. Good faith is grateful.
  3. Good faith is honest.
  4. Good faith is communal.
  5. Good faith is active.
  6. Good faith is tough.
  7. Good faith is relational.

Well, what do you think?

Is that a helpful list? Did he include things that shouldn’t be there? Did he leave out something you would have included? Which kind is strong in you?


coverBrian McLaren:
Finding Faith: A Self-discovery Guide for your Spiritual Quest

A Christian minister (in Maryland), but not out to tell you what to believe – he treats what believing is, good and bad faith, problems and benefits of affiliation with a church, ways to experience God, etc. Very useful.


See also:

Views: 117

Leave a Comment


  • Thank you, Rob

    “I could be accused of exactly that.” [Me too , of course.]

    “Rather exciting, but the irony is killing me…”

    Great line.

  • Visitor is me on a different computer, not logged in. I saw “Nowadays so many Christians seem overly concerned with the correctness of other peoples’ beliefs” and saw that I could be accused of exactly that, so I want to make yet another distinction: It’s true what bookaholic said. Some will “examine these beliefs for error”, classic legalist attitude of judging others. But some others will get hit in the face with pure lies that they cannot accept, with the tellers and believers of those lies caught in the devil’s trap (2 Timothy 2:25-26) being led into causing the same Bad Things I mentioned. For example: when Americans believe that we have to go overseas (and kill people) to defend ourselves here, that’s ridiculous. When Christians believe it, you can bet I’ll “seem overly concerned.” Rather exciting, but the irony is killing me…

  • Not quite sure where that 2nd comment is coming from. I’d say ‘bad faith’ in an accurate view of some key truths WILL still lead you to deep spiritual corruption and isolation from God.

    ‘Good faith’ that includes some ‘un-real’ ideas (and everyone has some ‘un-real’ ideas) will have one headed toward Ultimate Morality, Ultimate Reality, and Ultimate Blessing. God looks on the heart.

    Point: if anyone is serving certain (real or imagined) Biblical precepts from ‘bad faith’ motivations (“They examine these beliefs for error, like Sherlock Holmes”), they are sowing and and will reap destruction, for themselves and for others. That matters VERY much.

    Of course, many really bad things happen to people who don’t have every last facet of reality figured out. But that includes everybody. That’s why teaching, preaching, mentoring, etc., are so important. But they MUST be done in ‘good faith.’

    After all even Jesus, who surely had the ‘inside track’ on reality, had one or two ‘bad things’ happen to him as I recall. The biggest question really is, where is your heart? It does show, over time, to any who are paying attention. God, bless his ever-loving heart, really pays attention.

  • Can I add to that? My concern for others’ beliefs today is inseparable from my concern for their current delusions. There’s only one smoking gun, it’s in our hands. Believe it. You probably won’t go to hell for deviating from that truth, but a lot of Bad Things™ can happen to innocent people when you don’t have a grip on reality… I think I know, having been saved from nothing less than spiritual blindness.

  • Thank you for sharing the quotes from Brian McLaren’s book. I certainly agree that “based solely on unquestioned authority” deserves the number one spot on the bad faith list. And don’t forget the authoritarian circular reasoning that gives us gems like: “the Bible is inerrant because the Bible says so.”

    This posting reminded me that some years ago I heard someone make a distinction between faith (trust, commitment, devotion, discipleship etc.) and belief (a statement that something is true.) Nowadays so many Christians seem overly concerned with the correctness of other peoples’ beliefs. They examine these beliefs for error, like Sherlock Holmes looking at a clue with his magnifying glass.

    If you think the most important thing about being a Christian is to believe the right things, you are going to end up with a different version of Christianity than you’d get if you thought the most important thing was to follow Christ.