Contents of this Post
In the Gospel records of Jesus’ teaching – in the spiritual, metaphysical, theological, religious, and practical meaning of his actions and his words – that is, in Jesus’s actual life and teachings,
There are direct and major implications for how humans should live
their day-to-day lives in real societies in this real world. And those issues always are connected to who has clout in any given situation, and how they use that. And that usually (almost always?) has to do with economic issues.
I suggest that what have traditionally been thought of as “dogmatic questions” are more foreign to the import of the original texts in many cases than is the problem of power.
This reminds me of Amartya Sen, Harvard economist, arguing that there is really no effective difference between economics and ethics.
Economics is ethics.
Gospel teaching is much more ethical than metaphysical or doctrinal. His teaching is ethics, with an emphasis on power / economics as ethics [with very little implied or explicit metaphysics].
See Also on PublicChristian:
Was Social Justice Part of Jesus’ Message? Oh Yes. 4 Scriptures.
Arguing about dogma, “Dogmatic questions,” – which Jesus habitually avoided – could include things like,
- How sure are we that he was born of a virgin? How could that happen – physically, and spiritually?
- What are the proper definitions of the Son, the Father, and the Holy Spirit? What exactly is their relationship? Is there really a Trinity?
- How was, is, or should the church or churches be organized and managed?
- Who should be baptized, how, when, and by whom?
- What exactly is the extent of freedom of the will – if there is any such thing?
- How should weekly worship be managed? By whom? Should we be meeting on Saturdays?
- Who can be ordained? To what purposes? By whom?
- Just exactly how “infallible” are the Scriptures? Which Scriptures?
- What is the process you must go through – or the criteria you must meet – to join a church or to remain in good standing therein?
- Will the second coming occur in the next ten years?
BUT, says Yoder, we do know what the Lord thought and taught about some very practical and persistent issues.
We have the record of Jesus’ dealing explicitly with whether he should be king or whether we should love our enemies, and with what we should do with wealth;
Of course many of us who are active in church have at least tentative answers to some of those “dogmatic” questions. But we need to recognize that we are deriving those answers from some other source, not from Gospel teachings.
As to things churches really like to bring up, either against “unbelievers” or against each other, here’s one example from Yoder, and it’s not “very practical and persistent.”
only very indirectly can we get from his teachings any help on the metaphysics of incarnation.
Very interesting. And it becomes a question of emphasis. What kinds of things, then – I wonder – should we be focusing our attention and our efforts on?
See Also on PublicChristian:
– Jesus Named Wicked Ways (9 Examples) – We Can’t Hide
– What If Christians Don’t Listen to Jesus? See 5 Very Short, Very Important Stories from Matthew 7
Or, as Jesus himself asked, “Why do you call me ‘Lord, Lord’ and do not do what I say?”
__________
The quotes are from John Howard Yoder, The Politics of Jesus: Vicit Agnus Noster, Eerdmans, 1972, 1994. Chapter 8 “Christ and Power” footnote 1.
__________
See Also on PublicChristian
– Evangelicalism is Broken. Do They Know? Do They Care? (review of Labberton’s “Still Evangelical?”)
– Abusive Use of the Bible – a la Speaker Mike Johnson – is Fraud. But Popular, & a Handy Weapon.
__________
Questions for us:
1. How much are you surprised by the idea that “Jesus habitually avoided” dogmatic questions (metaphysics, “doctrine”, church organization and function, etc).
2. What then would you say ARE the obvious emphases of Jesus’s life and his teaching?
__________
Please add any comments below. (Your personal info is not required.)