Featured Nazism, Fascism

Hitler Pretended to Respect “My Lord and Savior” Jesus

It is not pleasant to study the face of evil, but it seems good that some of us be aware of its common habits, intentions, and techniques, and spread our findings around a bit. I’ve been browsing again in the speeches of Adolf Hitler*.

Hitler claimed respect for his "lord and savior" JesusThere are several patterns of manipulation and verbal violence – lying, fraud – that quickly stand out to me.

Hitler deliberately misused Christian terms and references to make himself sound like a true and devoted believer in Christ –

at least he would appear so to those who were not paying close attention, and unfortunately many believers and church leaders do not pay close attention to such things.

“L … said … that his feeling ‘as a man and a Christian’ prevented him from being an Anti-Semite. I say: my feeling as a Christian points me to my Lord and Saviour as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded only by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were … As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice.”

His comments a few minutes later in the same speech carry the flavor of Christ’s concern about the “sheep without a shepherd”.

“…the mightiest thing which our Movement must create: for these widespread, seeking, and straying masses a new Faith which will not fail them in this hour of confusion, to which they can pledge themselves, on which they can build so that they may at least find once again a place which may bring calm to their hearts.”

Well, there you have it. A new Messiah, offering to do the job successfully that Jesus nobly tried, and failed, to do.

This is a brilliant capitalizing on the religious feeling in many Germans while he explicitly subverts that religious loyalty and shifts it to the nation and its lying Leader. As I said above, this often works because Christian people are not paying close attention. They sometimes seem to think it is disrespectful or unbelieving to pay close attention. They are certainly wrong about that.

  • Constant lying about sub-groups of the German people, including Jews, liberals, government officials, artists, authors, and many others. I don’t mean political campaigning; I mean deliberate, vigorous, extensive, sustained deadly lying (sometimes linked with a few morsels of truth to make it go down easier).
  • Constant distortion of historical events. Again, not just occasional accidental misstatement or slight exaggeration, but deliberate, extensive, public lying.
  • Deliberate incitement to invasion and war on false pretenses.
  • Mocking of and non-cooperation with other nations and with international agencies, and abrogation of treaties.

All these things occur and recur in his speeches. To me all these behaviors ‘and those who practice them’ are profoundly cowardly, because they flee from and camouflage reality instead of dealing with it intelligently and effectively. But that’s beside the point, and it makes these evil behaviors no less effective or deadly. Whether he actually said it or not, his Nazis certainly practiced this concept: If you make the lies big enough, and say them often enough and loud enough, the people will believe and act on them.

Now the unpleasant question:

Do you see ways in which any of these practices have been present in America in recent years?

(See prior posts regarding Hitler and the Nazis.)

* Quotations are from The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, 1922-1939, ed. N H Baynes, Oxford University Press 1942, Howard Fertig Inc. 1969, p19 – 21

Leave a Comment


  • Yes, Martin, “admin” is me, Larry Harvey. I very much appreciate your thoughtful input on these important issues.

    I prefer for people to use names rather than “anonymous”, of course. But you know, I think some folks in the present climate in this country are afraid to have their names circulating too freely.

  • Thank you for taking up my cogitations, and affirmatively at that! But now I must try really hard to sort it out better. I wish to put some clarity and structure in my thesis for I can see the danger of that wisdom coming true which says subtle misunderstandings may be the worst. Please grant me some time for gathering up precision.

    P.S.: And please, never be bewildered if I play a wrong semantic chord – and thus achieve a misguided rhetoric. I certainly am glad and proud that our parent generations have bequeathed us a close friendship of our peoples, whereas wariness first told the US in 1945 to non-fraternize with the inhabitants of Nazi-Land. Yet, I firmly believe, a time has come when friendship must spell honesty and a searching probe to the core of those (spiritual) things that are of mutual concern, rather than even more furtherance of the intertwining of economic or military processes – that passes completely by, or even threats to vitiate the democratic cause on both parts. I preserve strong doubts that our chancellor in spe Ms. Merkel will serve us well there (though Mr. Schroeder too was certainly no darling).

    To be continued later,
    By the way, does your signature “admin” indicate, that I got answer from Larry Harvey, who edits this site. I am myself a little bit bewildered at the great number of contributors mailing without name or pseudonym. Am I missing a hint of how this forum ought to be accessed?

    Thanks for a personal reply, martin.bauer@online.de

  • Thank you Martin, for your thoughts on this. There is one clause in your comment that I do not understand (end of the first paragraph, “Compatriot (resp. Contemporary) anonymousâ€?). Otherwise I think I understand, and I appreciate it. Is this more or less what you are saying (expressed via more ordinary American usage)?

    If you (Martin) were to try to say to fellow believers in Germany something comparing recent American behavior to Nazi behavior in the 30’s you would be hissed to silence with accusations of being anti-American and extremist. That’s because Germans today think of their close ties to American authority as being proof of their democratic purposes, and their protection against such horrendous aberrations as happened 80 years ago. Since they have such close ties to the US, that great democracy, they don’t have to question W’s service of the wealthy and contempt for the weak. W, in fact, should not be questioned.

    The moral state of society in Germany in the 30’s was not dealt with in Biblical terms, but people instead focused on a few “obviousâ€? moral problems like sexual behavior, or ranted about the virtues of militarism and capitalism. Do we think that tyranny could become effective in America (or Germany) only after our democratic traditions and commitments have been publicly denounced and formally replaced? In fact, we might get tyranny while everyone is pretending we still have democracy.

  • Isn’t the world bizarre?

    I turn to an American website to find out what American Christians themselves (at least those of them who appreciate Jesus’ passion for the weak) think about G.W.B. and before long I stumble across a link of thought which – if strained at home in public speech at my German baptist congregation – might easily have stirred up a rush of hiss and murmer enough to turn my face to crimson. “Notorious America-hatred”, “rhetorical rowdiness” or “innate Teutonic unthankfulness” could have proved to be the more sophistaced pieces of feedback forthcoming.
    We Germans do virtually enshrine our concern and piety at those unparalleled crimes the lot of us has proved to be capable of. Tying ourselves to the apron-strings of our democracy’s great American nursery mother saves us from asking any real question about the impact of us sailing in the wake of W’s social darwinist ideology on the mental constitution of our democracy – which from the standpoint of Christian conviction should be nothing else but application of the twin commandment of love to our latent relationship with Compatriot (resp. Contemporary) anonymous.

    It was unconcern for the Word of God as resource of a sense individual responsibility for the deteriorating moral state of society that has made an earlier generation of us slip into the tyranny that will forever weigh upon our nation’s conscience. It was certainly not anything related to family values, sexual continence or that utterly vile effeminacy of not honouring with sufficient stoutness military and capitalism.
    So what do our friends of political correctness grieve about so bitterly? Nobody says Bush is Hitler, or that he would by his mindset forge America into a “Fourth Reich”. Yet again, which god of politics has ordained that effective tyranny could hold sway only after democracy be openly recanted?

    Thanks for a personal reply, martin.bauer@online.de

Follow by Email